Fortunately, about 85% of drivers routinely wear seatbelts.  However, there are still many drivers who don’t wear seatbelts sometimes.  If you are in a car wreck, not having  a seatbelt on can cause you to be more injured than if you were wearing one.  Many people hurt in car wrecks that don’t have their seatbelts on wonder if they still have a case.  In other words, does not having a seatbelt on prevent you from obtaining compensation for your injuries? The answer is No.   We can still help you obtain compensation for your injuries, any lost wages and pain and suffering. Continue reading “I was injured without my seatbelt on. Do I still have a case?”

Let’s say you’ve been in a car wreck which wasn’t your fault. Within a couple of days, you likely will get a phone call from the at-fault person’s insurance company. The insurance representative wants to “help” by offering you some fast money right away. Continue reading “Beware Of The First Offer From Insurance Companies”

Over a century ago, the United States enacted laws that punished businesses for selling alcohol to minors and to those people who are visibly intoxicated by alcohol.   The businesses would also be held responsible for damages caused by  either the intoxicated person or the minor. Continue reading “Are Bars And Restaurants Liable For Damages Caused By Drunk Drivers?”

You’re driving along, explaining to your grandkids how you know exactly what is in a Big Mac (from the jingle that’s been in your head for 25 years) when you glance in your rear view mirror.  It’s too late to avoid – all you can see is the way-too-close hood of a big SUV.  In a split second, you brace for the impact and everything that happens next. Continue reading “Should I See A Doctor After A Car Wreck?”

Tye Smith of our Oklahoma City office began a trial on June 23, 2009, before the District Court in Tulsa County.  Both parties agreed to have the assigned judge make the ruling, instead of a jury.  Our client had chronic complaints of neck pain following a rear end collision where the investigating officer estimated the damage to our client’s vehicle at $100, and the front of the other vehicle at $50.  The other driver claimed our client was not hurt and that all of the x-rays and MRIs were normal.  Our client’s doctors responded that she had damage to the facet joints in her neck and had also developed a rare disorder called Complex Regional Pain Syndrome as a result of her neck injury. Continue reading “$1M for Client Hurt in ‘Minimal Damage,’ Rear-end Collision”

If you were injured in an Oklahoma traffic crash in which multiple drivers share fault, you may encounter the phrase “comparative negligence” (also known as “comparative fault”).

In this post, the Oklahoma personal injury lawyers at Carr & Carr Attorneys at Law discuss comparative fault and how it impacts injury victims’ ability to recover compensation for medical expenses and other damages after a wreck.

What is Comparative Negligence?

Comparative negligence is a legal principle that many states—including Oklahoma and Arkansas—apply when more than one driver is responsible for a motor vehicle accident.

Under comparative negligence laws, a percentage of liability is assigned to each driver deemed at fault for a crash. Each individual involved could be awarded damages based on the other drivers’ levels of liability.

For example, consider a collision at an intersection between two cars. Driver A runs a stop sign and T-bones a car operated by Driver B, who had the legal right-of-way but was speeding. In this case, Driver A may be found 80 percent at fault and Driver B assigned 20 percent fault. If Driver B was injured and suffered $100,000 in damages, Driver B could collect $80,000 from Driver A’s insurance provider with the remaining $20,000 covered by his or her own insurance company.

Oklahoma’s 50-Percent Rule

Oklahoma’s comparative negligence statute includes a so-called “50-percent rule.”

In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident. If a crash victim is at least 50 percent liable for the wreck, he or she can’t seek compensation from other at-fault parties.

If Driver A in the example above had also suffered injuries in the crash, he or she would not have been eligible to recover damages from Driver B under Oklahoma’s 50-percent rule. It’s important to note that not all states with comparative negligence laws also adhere to the 50-percent rule.

Establishing Negligence in an Oklahoma Car Crash

Negligence is the failure to act with reasonable care. When assessing negligence, law enforcement and the courts consider whether an individual’s actions created an unreasonable risk of harm to others, and whether the individual attempted to eliminate or reduce that risk.

A driver can be deemed negligent for something he or she should not have done, such as running a red light or speeding. A driver may also be negligent for failing to do something he or she should have done, such as stopping for a pedestrian at a crosswalk or using headlights while driving at night.

When it comes to injury-related legal claims, there are four key factors that must generally be proven to establish negligence:

• The defendant had a legal obligation to the plaintiff
• The defendant breached that obligation
• The plaintiff suffered an injury and/or other damages
• The defendant’s breach of legal obligation caused the injury and/or other damages

Consider the above example again. Driver A had a legal obligation to Driver B to stop and yield the right-of-way. Driver A breached that duty by proceeding into the intersection without stopping. Driver B was injured, and those injuries were the result of Driver A’s negligence.

Establishing negligence after a car crash is important in determining the amount of damages you receive. However, there are many factors that can ultimately affect your share of liability. These factors can include police reports from the scene of the accident, witness accounts from others who saw the accident take place, and input from insurance adjusters.

How an Experienced Car Accident Lawyer Can Help

When multiple parties are responsible for a crash, insurance providers often attempt to shift the levels of responsibility in an effort to reduce the amount of money they pay out. This can prevent injury victims from getting the compensation they truly need to recover.

If you were hurt in an accident that was caused at least in part by another driver’s negligence, it’s a good idea to discuss your case with an experienced attorney. The Oklahoma personal injury lawyers at Carr & Carr understand that initial insurance company settlement offers are rarely enough to cover injury victims’ long-term needs.

Our attorneys can investigate your case and gather evidence to fairly assess negligence, guide you through the claims process, and negotiate with the insurance companies or their legal counsel to achieve a just settlement. We offer free consultations to help you understand your options, and we don’t charge for our services unless we collect compensation on your behalf.

If you were hurt in an accident that was caused by a negligent driver, please call us today at 866-510-0580 or contact us online. Carr & Carr has offices in Tulsa and Oklahoma City, but we’re proud to represent injury victims statewide.

A large portion of our clients come to us after suffering the effects of automobile accidents. Even low-speed collisions can cause tremendous pain and suffer from head and neck trauma. Often this pain lingers for months or even years.

Continue reading “Common Oklahoma Car Accident Injuries”